Publication Ethics

Duties of Authors

  1. Originality and Plagiarism
    Authors must ensure that their work is entirely original. Proper acknowledgment of the work of others must always be given. Plagiarism in all its forms constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable.
  2. Multiple or Concurrent Publication
    Authors should not submit the same manuscript to more than one journal concurrently. Submitting the same work to multiple journals constitutes unethical behavior.
  3. Acknowledgment of Sources
    Authors must properly cite all sources that have influenced their work.
  4. Authorship of the Paper
    Authorship should be limited to those who have made a significant contribution to the conception, design, execution, or interpretation of the study.
  5. Disclosure and Conflicts of Interest
    All authors should disclose any financial or other conflicts of interest that may influence the results or interpretation of their manuscript.
  6. Fundamental Errors in Published Works
    If an author discovers a significant error in their published work, it is their obligation to promptly notify the journal editor and cooperate to retract or correct the paper.

Duties of Editors

  1. Publication Decisions
    The editor is responsible for deciding which articles submitted to the journal should be published, based on the validity of the work and its importance to researchers and readers.
  2. Fair Play
    Editors evaluate manuscripts for their intellectual content without regard to race, gender, sexual orientation, religious belief, ethnic origin, citizenship, or political philosophy of the authors.
  3. Confidentiality
    Editors must not disclose any information about a submitted manuscript to anyone other than the corresponding author, reviewers, and publisher.
  4. Conflict of Interest
    Editors must not use unpublished materials disclosed in a submitted manuscript for their own research without the author’s explicit written consent.

Duties of Reviewers

  1. Contribution to Editorial Decisions
    Peer review assists the editor in making editorial decisions and may also assist the author in improving the manuscript.
  2. Promptness
    Reviewers should notify the editor if they feel unqualified to review the manuscript or unable to complete the review in a timely manner.
  3. Confidentiality
    Manuscripts received for review must be treated as confidential documents.
  4. Objectivity
    Reviews should be conducted objectively. Personal criticism of the author is inappropriate.
  5. Acknowledgment of Sources
    Reviewers should identify relevant published work that has not been cited by the authors.
  6. Conflict of Interest
    Reviewers must not review manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest.